The
concept of “going viral” is familiar as sharing information allows for the production
and distribution of information. It is important to distinguish virality in different
centuries as methods of interaction and technologies have changed. The major
difference in going viral from 18th century Common Sense to 21st century meme’s such as Alex from
Target is the use of technology in producing and distributing information. In Going Viral, virality is discussed as a
social process where information over a short period of time spreads, close and
distant networks (Polity Press, 2013). This is evident in Paine’s Common Sense and online sensation ‘Alex
from Target’ as they both went viral quickly in several places. Virality is
measured by characteristics of sharing, speed, and reach in terms of distance
and number of individuals exposed to media content.
Paine’s
pamphlet, Common Sense, spread like
wildfire selling a thousand copies in just a few days. During this time period
technology such as the Internet was not accessible so sharing and distribution
of content was done through physical means, recommendations and speech. In only
10 days Common Sense spread to other
states and copies were being shared (Standage 141). After production improved,
distribution and reach rose rapidly as 200,000 copies sold, making Paine a best
selling author (Standage 143). The first articulation links to Common Sense as a message is received in
the pamphlet which holds an important meaning that sparks ideas towards
independence (mode of communication). The message within created responses as
it changed attitudes of citizens on independence through its ability to provoke
emotions resulting in more conversation (mode of affect). An accumulation of
money and power resulted as Paine sold thousands of copies making him
financially successful and gaining authority (mode of accumulation). The second
articulation emphasizes virality in highlighting production, distribution and
consumption. Common Sense was
produced through print communication, distributed manually and eventually
orally as circulation improved leading to consumption of the information presented
which sparked individual’s interpretation through reception.
The
world was introduced to social media phenomenon ‘Alex from Target’ in 2014. Alex
gained international viral popularity when a customer tweeted a picture of him.
The hashtag #AlexFromTarget trended worldwide in just hours with it being mentioned
over 1 million times on Twitter alone (knowyourmeme.com). Alex’s charm quickly gained
him 250,000 followers and fan images were created on social media accounts like
Instagram and Tumblr. Articulation one links to ‘Alex from Target’ through the
message received in the initial tweet by @auscalum emphasizing
the charm of this employee (mode of communication). Immediately Alex mesmerized
users of Twitter and Web 2.0 as he generated admiration and obsession among
thousands (mode of affect). These emotions alongside virality led to Target’s
brand success as this ‘famous’ employee was attributed with their company. Alex
himself gained thousands of new followers and became an Internet sensation
(Mode of accumulation). The second articulation is evidently different than Common Sense. Alex’s production was
through Web 2.0 platform Twitter an online social media site. Distribution took
place through the circulation of information via retweets, favourites and
hashtags which led to consumption of the phenomenon where admiration was
present and spin offs of the fad were created like ‘Frankie from Starbucks’.
In
analyzing both one can easily distinguish differences of virality in the 18th
versus 21st century. Virality today is seen to be easier through
technology like the Internet allowing for rapid and easy sharing of information,
whereas the 18th century utilized print production, physical distribution
and oral communication. What do you think about Alex's fame? He even ended up on The Ellen Show!
Hey Alexandria,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your post, especially since I have always found Alex from target's fame to be odd. You are right, virality in the 21st century is much easier through the constant introduction of new communication technology. 5 years ago I would have never thought a single picture of a teenage employee of target would become a viral sensation, yet today if something like this happened again, I would not think twice about it. It has become the norm. Paine's virality was based upon the idea of intellect, and important information, making him famous for his thoughts. Today, viral content is based upon unexpectedness, and entertainment, making it easy for people to get famous for basically nothing. I think that Alex's fame is disposable, without meaningful content we are constantly moving from one viral sensation to the next. Fame based on intellectual ideas create a concrete platform to promote and share messages. Will anyone remember Alex from target 3 centuries from now? Probably not.
Great post Alex :)
ReplyDeleteGreat use of example, the Alex from Target fame is definitely worth analyzing in understanding how digital media affects our everyday lives. In this weeks reading in chapter six of Nancy Baym's book, Personal Connections in the Digital Age, she discusses how the internet allows for 'fans' to get close to their desired role model, band, celebrity etc. In this example Alex from Target became a internet celebrity, captivating the attention and hearts of many young girls, which led to the sharing and distribution of his photo.