Essena O’Neill
was a famous Instagram model who recently posted a radical blog on October 31st
2015 revealing the dangers behind social media. She first posted a vlog on Vimeo
and then two days later posted a clip on YouTube explaining her decision to
quite social media, in the mean time she deleted over two thousand of her Instagram
pictures and renamed her Instagram “social media is not real life”. O’Neill
explained how her life was negatively impacted by instagram as she spent most
of her days going to extremes to get the ‘perfect picture’ and being paid by
companies to promote their products.
Essena O’Neill's radical message went viral.
Another
radical whose revolutionary message went viral was that of Thomas Paine in the
late eighteenth century. Pain created a pamphlet called Common Sense which argued
for America’s independence and separation from the British power (Standage,
140).
Both O’Neill
and Paine’s content of communication were very radical, but the message was articulated
in different modes of communication. Both authors used simplified language to articulate
the message so that the general public was able to understand. However, O’Neills
message became popular faster than Paine's, because it was more accessible. O’Neill
shared her message through social media, meaning that it was quickly shared on different
social networks and made available to anyone who had internet access. Meanwhile,
Common Sense was a pamphlet and only one thousand copies were published at
first, thus it took longer for Paine's message to reach the majority of the
population. Furthermore, rather then individuals simply digitally sharing Common
Sense, people had to read aloud Paine’s pamphlet in coffee shops or physically
share their copy with a friend. Hence the communication modes of affect took
longer for Paine then that of O’Neill's. In other words, individuals were tentative
to form an opinion about Common Sense, until they knew what their peers
thought. Meaning, that they had to wait till the friends read the text then
write a letter or discuss it face to face before coming to a conclusive decision
about Common Sense (Standage 139-145). However
O’Neill’s blog received immediate feedback as individuals were able to view
their peers thoughts by reading the comments written on the blog, and also take
note of their social media friends who shared the message on viral networking
sites. Hence, O’Neills blog gained power/popularity faster, rather than Paine’s
which took a while to be recognized and become influential (mode of accumulation).
Hey Michelle,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your post on Essena O'Neill's virality. I found your point on how both O'Neill and Pain simplified their language for the purpose of reaching the largest audience interesting. It is true that both Paine and O'Neill went viral due to this, and allowed for audiences to make informed opinions on the medias. Since O'Neill shared her video through social media, it gained popularity much faster than Paine's Common Sense. How effective do you think O'Neill's video was, and why do you think it gained so much popularity?
Thanks for your post!
Hi Michelle,
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I really enjoyed learning more about Essena O'Neill's story and viewpoints regarding social media. It's really interesting to compare social media forms and see how it has exponentially developed overtime. I definitely agree with your point that both Payne and O'Neill carefully chose what key information they wish to disseminate to the public. I feel technology has had a tremendous influence on how information is presented and consumed by individuals in society. I would argue that technology is one of the most significant factors that has contributed to the advancement of social media. Technology has enabled information to be shared virtually instantaneously allowing individuals to foster both discussion and debate.
Answering Louise's question asked above, I believe that O'Neill's video was effective and appealed to the general public. Her viewpoints and values definitely resonate with those trying to fit in with the media's vision and norms in society. The media continues to capitalize on individuals (in particular females) weaknesses in order to maximize profit. Therefore, I could see many individuals agreeing with her viewpoints. On the other hand, I have seen some posts that do not support O'Neill's opinion, claiming it was her choice to post certain images and her choice to endorse various products and companies. As noted above, this reinforces the notion that sharing information online allows for instantaneous reactions and opinions on the subject matter.
Hey Michelle!
ReplyDeleteI found your post to be especially interesting after our discussion about Essena O'Neill in class today. I didn't watch the whole video, but I saw it shared through social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, meaning that it was able to influence many people all over the world. I also think it is interesting to compare O'Neill's video and Paine's Common Sense pamphlet and the differences in how they were both able to go viral. Although they went viral for different reasons and in different ways, it is interesting that they both can be compared for featuring similar characteristics in their virality.