Monday, 9 November 2015

Blog 3: Common Sense vs. The Double Rainbow

Common Sense vs. The Double Rainbow

Common Sense was a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine in 1776. The pamphlet was comprised of an argument in favor of the American Revolution. During this time, pamphlets were an imperative medium for the diffusion of ideas. Within 10 days of Common Sense’s emergence, the printed publication went viral, as it spread outside of Philadelphia into various other cities. Paine even allowed other printers to copy it and capitalize off of its demand. The pamphlet was also spread through letters and from hand to hand. Its influence became contagious in that it not only “transformed attitudes toward independence, which had previously been something many people were reluctant to talk about, let alone support,” (Standage 144) but also became the “most popular and influential pamphlet of the American Revolution” (Standage 146). Essentially, the pamphlet provided Paine with a medium that enabled him to publicize his messages of which had a notable impact on American opinion of the time.

Fast-forwarding now to the 21st century, where the virality of social media has become much quicker, due to the ease at which we are able to spread media texts from person to person within our culture. The double rainbow offers us a relevant example of the virality of social media in today’s world. The link to the double rainbow YouTube video can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI The creator of the video Paul Vasquez uploaded it to YouTube and then it was eventually sent on to Jimmy Kimmel. At the time it had 800 views, but after Jimmy Kimmel posted a link to it on twitter it gained nearly 7 million views in less than two weeks. As a result, Jimmy Kimmel became a tastemaker. Tastemakers, which we learned in class from Kevin Alloca, are the key gatekeeping factor in the temporary media ecology. From there, community participation followed allowing users to become part of the phenomenon, wherein mentions, remixes, and parodies of the Double Rainbow video were made, all of which creatively transformed the original content of the Double Rainbow video.


The virality of social media of the 18th century thus differs greatly from the virality of social media in the 21st century because of the Internet and various communication technologies available to us today, which allow us to disseminate media content i.e. memes from person to person within our culture with just the click of a button. In conclusion, it is important to note however, that just because something is uploaded to the Internet does not mean it will go viral, as its virality greatly depends on the amount of views and shares that a media text receives. Specifically, the greater the range of platforms in terms of the production of the media texts, means the greater the distribution and circulation, which then means the greater the occasions that there will be for the consumption of these media texts.

4 comments:

  1. Hi Brittany, great post! I thoroughly enjoyed reading your piece on "Common Sense" and "Double Rainbow". I can only imagine what the results would have been if Thomas Paine had access to social media sites to share his message. His ability to share his uncontested point of view is, I feel, significant to the success of his message. I would be interested to know what the results would have been if those loyal to Britain were able to contest his point of view on a social platform. Taking this into account I think virality has transformed into the virality of conversation rather than the virality of an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Brittany,

    I really enjoyed your comparison between "Common Sense" and the "Double Rainbow" video! Virality in the 18th century versus the 21st century varies greatly, and I agree that this is due to the development of the Internet and the endless communication technologies that are available to us. Because of these technologies, there are no limits to the amount that we are able to view and share media. Given this major change in how we communicate and understand media, do you believe that virality is more or less impressive in todays culture?

    Good job Brittany!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey guys, thanks for your comments! In response to your question Louise, I would absolutely say that today’s virality is less impressive in comparison to the virality of the 18th century, simply because communication technologies and the Internet have opened up new ways for us to share media content – and whilst this is impressive in itself, the virality of media in the 18th century was less common and a lot harder to achieve. So considering that Paine’s pamphlet caused the reaction that it did after all of the effort made causing it to go viral, is impressive to say the least!

    ReplyDelete