When
Australian social media influencer Essena O’Neill decided to highlight the
issues of inauthenticity within social media the world took notice. Through the
process of deleting more than half of her Instagram photos, changing the
captions on her remaining photos to show the “real” side of social media, and
creating a new website titled “Let’s Be Game Changers”, O’Neill touched on the
most important issues that she believes are affecting social media users today.
O’Neill’s abrupt decision to quit the social media sites that had made her
famous came as a shock to many, as she had built up a fan base of hundreds of
thousands of people. Jose Van Dijck’s argument that the culture of connectivity
arises through the process of continuous pressure “both from peers and
technologies – to expand through competition and gain power through strategic
alliances” highlights the issues surrounding constant social media usage (21).
When Van Dijck states that “Platform tactics such as the popularity principle
and ranking mechanisms… are firmly rooted in a ideology of that values
hierarchy, competition and a winner take all mindset” (21), she is speaking to
the process by which social media users obsess over elements such as likes and
followers as they judge the overall success of their presence on social media.
I believe Essena
O’Neill’s recent actions to be supportive of Van Dijck’s “neoliberal economic
principles” of the culture of connectivity of contemporary social media
platforms. O’Neill’s abrupt decision to deconstruct the online reality that she
had built through social media came from a place of dissatisfaction. Since
O’Neill fabricated a perfect reality for her followers, it was her social media
presence as a whole that revolved around “the popularity principle and ranking
mechanisms” that Van Dijck speaks to. In O’Neill’s YouTube video “Why I REALLY
am quitting social media” she confesses that the world of social media is fake
and that although she was able to build an entire career around her online
presence, the perfection that is shown through the online world does not
translate to real life. Van Dijck’s “neoliberal economic principles” demonstrates
how the online world of social media is fabricated for the purpose of fostering
competition between one another. This is done because the process of
connectivity will always contain the element of popularity. There will always
be someone gaining more likes than you, taking better pictures that you, and
ultimately performing better than you on social media. It is for this reason
that Essena O’Neill found it necessary to quit social media all together in
order to gain some perspective on what really matters. The importance of
recognizing the fabricated competition that is constructed through the use of
social media is demonstrated by O’Neill, as she states “There is so much more
we could be doing than editing ourselves and proving ourselves to others”. In
the case of Essena O’Neill, I hope that she finds what she is looking for
outside of her online persona, and that she lives a more authentic life. I believe
that despite the fame she found through apps such as Instagram, O’Neill will
have no problem forming meaningful connections with her peers outside of her
social media bubble. What do you think?
Hi Louise,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your viewpoints on Essena O'Neill's decision to quit social media. I definitely agree with you that technology and social media enables insecurities and competition. It's a constant competition as you are always comparing yourself to the next best thing. This can definitely take a toll on one's self worth and identity.
I support Essena O'Neill's viewpoints, however she has not completely quit social media. O'Neill has launched a new website, 'let's be game changers' which exemplifies numerous tabs and ideas. One of the tabs 'support this' is seeking funding from the public. I find this a bit tasteful. She claims she is fully against social media, yet is using it as a platform to seek financial aid. O'Neill claims a portion of funding will go towards, "building a bigger and better platform for the site." What is your opinion on this? Do you feel it challenges her overarching argument of social media?
I agree with your viewpoints on how social media enables insecurities like anxiety and competition. I also agree with the comment above on how she really hasn't quit social media. In addition to her asking for financial help she is also in the process of writing her first book, "How To Be Social Media Famous". I believe that despite her looking for financial aid, she continues to look for ways to stay connected. I wonder if this is due to the culture we live. But how long can we really stay connected for until we realize that we are staying connected to just maintain an image or for genuine purposes.
ReplyDelete